Quality assurance
Automated testing pays off when the suite is trusted. We staff engineers who build for that: stable selectors, isolated data, parallel execution, and a failure that means something rather than a flake everyone learns to ignore.
A 30-minute call to establish what exists today, what has to be true at the end, and what the real deadline is. No proposal is written before this.
You receive three to five profiles with the specific experience the work needs, their rates, and their availability. You interview whoever you want.
Most engagements start with a short paid trial on a real task. You pay nothing until you decide to hire, and nothing at all if the trial does not convince you.
One person owns the outcome and reports weekly against what was agreed. Scope changes are priced before they are built, not after.
When this is the wrong choice
Automating a product whose interface changes weekly wastes money. Stabilize the critical paths first and automate those.
Tell us what you are trying to ship. You get a matched shortlist in 48 hours and pay $0 until you hire.
API tests, almost always. They are faster, more stable, and cover more logic per test. UI automation should cover the handful of journeys that must never break.
A suite covering the critical paths of a mid-sized product typically takes six to ten weeks, then grows with the product.
Usually shared test data and brittle selectors. Both are fixable in a few weeks and both are the reason teams abandon automation.
Roles we place for this
Related services
Vetted engineers, matched in 48 hours. No recruitment fees, no payment until you hire.
🇦🇪 Trusted by companies across Dubai, Abu Dhabi & all 7 Emirates